Full Service Stockbrokers
Full Service Stockbrokers
You can find full service stockbrokers at the most well-known and established companies,
including
Salomon Smith Barney
Morgan Stanley
Goldman Sachs
Merrill Lynch
For all their eminent reputations, however, brokerage firms use a substantially different track
for selling stock than the average investor would think. The company that uses the
expression about making money the old-fashioned way-earning it-isn't lying. They just
didn't specify for
whom they were making that old-fashioned money.
Bluntly put, stockbrokers have to make a living, too. And that lifestyle isn't cheap. Did I
mention that full service brokers also charge the highest commissions? I've heard of full
service brokers who charge up to $75 per transaction. Even though the average investor may
be aware of these commissions, what goes largely unsaid is the other ways in which
stockbrokers make money or further their business.
You should know upfront that in all fairness, full service brokers and brokerages have their
uses and place within investment. Many people, for a variety of reasons, do utilize the
services of full service brokers and brokerages and do very well by them.
For example, someone with enough money in the market to prohibit the time needed to
effectively keep track of investment trends (because the person is using all that time to make
the money that's being invested) would make a good candidate for a full service broker.
Also, someone who was planning to buy and/or sell on a daily basis is an example of
someone who might fare well using the services of a broker. Although this type of client,
however, would still do well to consider excessive service fees involved in these kinds of
services. In addition, most stockbrokers aren't dishonest and do play upfront with their
clients. After all, unhappy clients will leave sooner or later, so it's in the stockbroker's best
interest to keep them happy.
The average stockbroker, however, does have to make a living. So, for example, a
stockbroker with his or her huge wealth of knowledge tells you that purchasing stock in XYZ
Company is the single best thing you can do. You invest as the stockbroker tells you to; after
all, who are you to second-guess the stockbroker? You're a dentist with little or no knowledge
of how all this works, whereas the broker has years of experience and access to a substantial
amount of firm research- usually from within the brokerage house itself. So, the stockbroker
takes a commission for placing the purchase order. The stockbroker is happy; you're happy.
What could be wrong?
Did the stockbroker mention that the reason you should buy XYZ Company stock is also
because he or she needs to sell a certain amount of XYZ Company's stock in order to retain
his or her account, and the broker was running pretty close to the end of the month without
having reached that quota? Or did the stockbroker mention that the company is giving him or
her a cut of the sale out of the backside for each share the broker places with a client? The
stockbroker wasn't lying about XYZ Company stock being the best purchase you could make.
The broker just failed to mention that the payday was his or hers, not yours.
Also, the "research" that you thought would make a difference, and that went largely
unnoticed in this transaction was flawed anyway. The analysts who compile this research are
under extraordinary pressure from upper management as well as from the clients themselves
to back up the interests of the company. Not necessarily to lie, mind you, but to present the
information in its best-or in the case of the competitor, the worst-possible light.
CAUTION
A full service broker usually manages his or her client's account directly and charges
the highest commissions.
And finally, from personal experience, many people develop a good working relationship with
their brokers and a strong sense of loyalty keeps them as clients. Even in these situations,
however, be aware of the whole story.
.