For example, suppose that you have just purchased 10 shares of XYZ Company stock at $10
For example, suppose that you have just purchased 10 shares of XYZ Company stock at $10
per share. XYZ Company knows that, as a new company, it may have a little difficulty finding
new investors in the market right now, so the company attaches a warrant to each share that
you have just purchased (free of charge, no less). The warrant entitles you to buy a share of
XYZ Company stock for $11, regardless of what it's selling for on the market. Since you have
just bought the stock for $10 per share, it would be kind of silly to pay $11 per share right
now.
But, in the course of time, the price of XYZ Company rises to $13 per share. By cashing in
your warrants, you could buy 10 more shares of XYZ Company stock at the price of $11 per
share, thereby making an immediate profit of $20 ($11 × 10 = $110, versus $13 × 10 =
$130).
Let's say that when you purchased those 10 initial shares and received the warrants, you
were satisfied because you really only wanted 10 shares to begin with. You figured the
warrants were nice but relatively useless, right? No. As in the subscription rights example,
you can sell or otherwise dispose of warrants however you see fit. Therefore, if the price of
XYZ Company stock rises to $13 per share, you have 10 warrants to use for purchasing that
stock at $11 per share.
I'm an investor who wants to purchase XYZ Company stock, so you offer to sell me your
warrants for $1 each. I use your warrants to purchase XYZ Company stock at $11 per share,
and I still save $10 ($11 × 10 = 110 + $10 = $120, versus $13 × 10 = $130). You've just
made $10 by selling me something you didn't want to begin with, and XYX Company has
attracted a new investor. Everybody's happy.
More on Warrants
Many investors buy and sell warrants, completely ignoring the underlying stock, because
oftentimes more money can be made from the warrant transactions. For example, let's say
you bought those 10 warrants from me at $1 each. Instead of using them to buy stock, you
hold on to them and wait until the price of XYZ Company stock climbs to $14 per share. You
then find another investor who is willing to pay $2 per warrant. The advantage to the buyer is
that he or she acquires the right to buy XYZ Company shares at the bargain price of $11
each. The buyer will still save $10 in the transaction ($2 × 10 warrants = $20 and $11 × 10
shares = $110; $20 + $110 = $130, versus $140 to purchase 10 shares at $14). The investor
has saved money, and you have made $10 from your initial $10 investment, effectively giving
you a 100-percent profit.
Of course, if the price of XYZ Company stock never rises above $11 per share, you've just
bought a dog with fleas. Welcome to the wonderful world of investing.
Also, it should be noted that XYZ Company is not issuing warrants for the sake of being nice.
As noted in the previous example, companies typically issue stock because they are
relatively young and/or may have a difficult time otherwise attracting new investors. Since
warrants are almost always issued at a higher purchase price than what the stock is currently
selling for, the company and the recipients of those warrants are all betting that the price of
the stock will rise. Many times, those recipients are other companies or are brokerage
houses, because companies often will pay each other off through the transfer of warrants. As
in the example when no actual stock changed hands, these brokerage houses and
companies will then sell the warrants to individual investors in order to raise cash without
having to make a capital investment of their own, or with only a minimal one. In addition, this
action effectively launches the warrants onto the common market for everyone to buy and
sell.